A new political analysis warns that a carefully designed strategy may be underway to secure the ruling structure in Serbia, with critics claiming it could reshape the country’s electoral and institutional landscape. The discussion centers on Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, whose recent remarks about election night scenarios have fueled speculation about how the government plans to maintain control.
According to the report, a detailed plan is allegedly being prepared to manage every phase of the electoral process—from campaign conditions and voting procedures to the final confirmation of results. Critics argue that proposed changes to election laws could make it easier for authorities to influence outcomes and reduce the effectiveness of opposition campaigns.
Legal expert and member of Serbia’s election commission Sofija Mandić warned that draft legislation could allow practices such as so-called “phantom lists,” which critics say might confuse voters and dilute opposition support.
At the same time, the analysis suggests that control over key institutions and the security sector is also being strengthened, with the appointment of Marko Kričak to a leading role in the criminal police cited as an example by critics who fear increasing political influence over law enforcement.
Another major concern raised in the report is the growing pressure on the media landscape. The article claims that smaller local outlets are disappearing while new pro-government platforms are emerging. Attention has also been drawn to the role of major communication structures such as Telekom Srbija and the public broadcaster Radio-televizija Srbije, which critics say could play a significant role in shaping public narratives ahead of future elections.
The analysis further speculates that long-term political planning may include a potential return by Vučić to the role of prime minister once his presidential mandate ends, potentially triggering new presidential elections and reshaping the balance of power.
Despite these preparations, the article concludes that elections might still not be imminent, as political uncertainty remains high and public dissatisfaction could influence how events unfold in the coming period.
