With Kosovo approaching the early parliamentary elections on 28 December, several civil society organizations are voicing concerns about actions that could undermine the integrity of the process. The Executive Director of the Kosovo Center for Security Studies (KCSS), Mentor Vrajolli, has warned of interference attempts from Serbia, while the Kosovo Law Institute (IKD) has challenged the legality of the plan to open additional voting centers outside official diplomatic missions.
One month before the vote, watchdogs fear that irregularities and political manipulation could damage public trust.
Mentor Vrajolli cautioned that efforts to influence the elections — particularly from Serbia — represent a serious threat to Kosovo’s democratic processes.
“Manipulation attempts, especially from Serbia, are already evident. It is clear that one party receives nearly all votes, and this party is closely tied to the authorities in Serbia. This undermines pluralism and prevents the emergence of independent political actors,” Vrajolli stated.
IKD Challenges Legality of Additional Voting Centers Abroad
In a public reaction, the Kosovo Law Institute (IKD) has expressed concern over a decision by the Central Election Commission (CEC) that would allow voting not only in embassies and consulates but also in 10 additional locations abroad for diaspora voters.
According to IKD, the decision violates the Law on Elections and electoral regulations.
“IKD calls on the CEC to halt actions that contradict the law and electoral rules. Respect for the law is fundamental to electoral integrity and the democratic functioning of institutions. The CEC is legally obliged to ensure that all electoral processes are fully lawful and credible,” the statement reads.
Concerns Over Political Rhetoric and Disinformation
Another point of concern raised by civil society relates to the language used by political actors during the campaign.
Vrajolli told Ekonomia Online that Kosovo continues to suffer from a lack of political will to combat disinformation, noting that parties should base their campaigns on concrete plans and realistic programs, not on manipulation and fabricated narratives.
“Everyone is benefiting from disinformation. It seems politicians are more worried about whether someone else is using disinformation platforms more effectively, rather than the overall damage caused. There is no serious initiative from any side to counter disinformation,” Vrajolli added.
