Lawyer Ardian Bajraktari has stated that although the Constitutional Court of Kosovo established a 30-day deadline for the constitution of the Assembly, it failed to clarify the consequences if this timeframe is exceeded.
Speaking on the program FIVE, Bajraktari emphasized that while decisions of the Constitutional Court are binding on all institutions, the ruling in this particular case lacks clarity on several key legal elements.
“Decisions of the Constitutional Court are binding for implementation by the judiciary and all relevant parties. However, in this ruling, there is a lack of clarity—especially regarding the consequences that follow the expiration of the 30-day period,” said Bajraktari.
He noted that while the explanatory section of the ruling is relatively well-written, the operative part lacks essential elements that would make the judgment complete and legally unambiguous.
“The reasoning part is written well, but the Court did not provide an explicit answer to some of the issues raised by political entities. It would have been helpful for the Court to address these questions, including whether the actions of the acting chairperson before the ruling’s publication were in line with the Constitution,” he added.
Bajraktari concluded that the failure to specify what happens after the 30-day deadline leaves room for varying interpretations and institutional uncertainty.
“The Court set the timeframe but didn’t specify what happens afterward. This means the situation remains insufficiently clarified,” he stressed.
