French President Emmanuel Macron expressed confidence in Serbia’s ability to “find the path to dialogue again” after his meeting with Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić in Paris, reports RFE. Macron also voiced hope that Serbia’s future government would “decisively continue the expected reforms and strengthen the very good economic results.”
Vučić, speaking after the meeting, noted that the world is entering “a turbulent era that will last,” emphasizing that it is beneficial for Serbia to have a strong ally in Europe like France.
On social media, Macron highlighted their discussions about cooperation, Serbia’s European integration, the Serbia-Kosovo relations, and the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. He reiterated France’s deep commitment to Serbia’s democratic and European future.
Macron also underscored France’s firm support for Bosnia and Herzegovina’s unity, condemning any actions that aim to jeopardize it. He further stressed the importance of respecting the constitutional order to help Bosnia and Herzegovina return to its European path.
Vučić remarked that the most difficult issue discussed was the situation in the Bosnian entity of Republika Srpska (RS). He emphasized that while he has fought for a compromise solution, he cannot accept that arresting RS President Milorad Dodik is the only solution, describing it as creating more problems. He added that he presented his ideas for resolving the crisis but did not specify what those ideas were.
The two leaders also discussed Serbia’s European future, with Vučić asking France to participate in the 2027 Expo in Belgrade, to which Macron confirmed France’s participation.
Vučić also mentioned the ongoing protests and blockades in Serbia, telling Macron that the country has been enduring “terror” for the last four months. These protests, led by students and supported by various sectors of society, demand accountability for the deaths of 16 people in a Novi Sad accident. The protests have become a symbol of broader discontent with the rule of law in the country and have raised questions about negligence and corruption in the system.
