The Kosovo Prosecutorial Council (KPK) is considering the dismissal of Acting Chief Prosecutor Besim Kelmendi, a proposal that has triggered a strong response from Kelmendi, who vowed to remain stoic and defend the prosecutorial system.
The proposal was made by Jehona Grantolli, KPK’s Deputy Chair, citing recent developments, including Kelmendi’s appearance as a witness before the Special Prosecution regarding reports that he was present in Reçak during the massacre. Grantolli emphasized that Kelmendi no longer represents the unity of the prosecutorial system and that calls for his dismissal reflect interests of particular individuals rather than the institution.
“Justice cannot be an arena for personal interests or guided by voices of fear. It cannot become a stage for political, economic, or personal bargaining. In this institution, there is only space for truth,” Grantolli said during the meeting.
Kelmendi responded sharply, questioning the motives behind the proposal and suggesting it was orchestrated by a narrow group of individuals:
“The speech delivered today by the Deputy Chair was clearly prepared by someone else. If there are groups involved, identify them. I will not resign. I have decided to remain stoic and protect the Prosecutorial System,” Kelmendi said, criticizing attempts to undermine the independence and integrity of the office.
The tensions highlight deeper divisions within Kosovo’s prosecutorial body, where political pressures and internal conflicts have increasingly influenced decision-making. Observers note that Kelmendi’s stance could set a precedent for resisting politically motivated interference in prosecutorial appointments.
Despite the controversy, Kelmendi emphasized his commitment to upholding constitutional and legal principles, rejecting what he described as attempts by new KPK members to disrupt the office and target individuals dedicated to protecting due process.
