Students from multiple faculties of the University of Novi Sad have reported receiving threatening phone calls warning them not to organize a protest scheduled for February 16 against Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić.
Threatening Messages Described as “Final Warning”
According to student representatives, numerous students received calls from unknown numbers shortly after internal meetings discussing plans for a peaceful and public protest. The messages reportedly ended with what was described as a “final warning,” suggesting that students could face legal consequences if the protest proceeds.
The callers allegedly warned of potential charges including disturbing public order, attacking state officials, and undermining constitutional order, claims that student organizers strongly deny.
Protest Linked to Presidential Visit
The protest was announced following confirmation of Vučić’s planned visit to Matica srpska to mark the institution’s 200th anniversary celebration, scheduled to take place at the Serbian National Theatre in Novi Sad.
Student groups and civic assemblies previously called for a public gathering outside the theatre to express political dissent regarding the president’s visit and broader governance concerns.
Students Demand Investigation Into Data Access
In a public statement titled “Students Are Not Cowards,” organizers released testimonies from individuals who received the calls and published several phone numbers allegedly linked to the threats. Students questioned how unknown individuals gained access to personal information, including phone numbers and movement details.
They have formally called on authorities to launch an urgent investigation, identify those responsible for the intimidation attempts, and clarify whether any institutional or organized structure was involved.
Students Reaffirm Commitment to Peaceful Protest
Student representatives emphasized that the planned gathering is intended to remain strictly non-violent and constitutionally protected. They rejected accusations of intending to harm public officials or institutions, stating that such claims are baseless and designed to discourage civic participation.
The case has intensified concerns among civil society observers regarding freedom of assembly, privacy protection, and political pressure in Serbia, particularly amid heightened political tensions and public demonstrations.
