Serbian opposition politician Nikola Sandulović has published an extensive public statement accusing Serbia’s President Aleksandar Vučić and other senior state figures of involvement in a series of politically motivated murders, threats, and violent acts committed during and after the Balkan conflicts.
In his statement, Sandulović alleges that Vučić “has a hand in every political killing,” explicitly naming the assassination of Serbian politician Oliver Ivanović and the killing of Kosovo police officer Afrim Bunjaku. He further claims that Vučić intended to arm his close associate, Milan Radoičić, whom he describes as the president’s “private terrorist,” and send him into Kosovo — an action Sandulović says led to fatal consequences.
“He thought of arming his private terrorist Milan Radoičić and sending him to Kosovo – and a Kosovo policeman was killed as a result,” Sandulović said.
Allegations of a Pattern of Political Violence
Sandulović argues that these events form part of a consistent pattern of using violence for political ends, claiming that threats made against journalists and political opponents have frequently been followed by physical attacks or killings.
He also references atrocities committed during the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, linking them to public statements made by former Serbian officials that he describes as incitements to violence with devastating consequences for civilians.
Personal Threats and Regional Risks
According to Sandulović, he himself has previously been the target of serious threats. He warns that the continuation of what he calls the same political and institutional mindset could further destabilize the region.
His accusations have generated significant public debate, prompting concerns about political accountability, rule of law, and ongoing tensions in the Western Balkans.
No Official Response Yet
As of now, Serbian state institutions have not commented on Sandulović’s claims.
The allegations remain unverified, and their investigation falls under the responsibility of domestic and international legal institutions, which would need to assess the credibility and evidence behind the accusations.
