The Venice Commission has formally opened its 147th Plenary Session to deliberate on vital structural amendments to a sweeping packet of judicial laws passed by Serbia’s National Assembly earlier this year.
A high-level state delegation from Belgrade, led by National Assembly Speaker Ana Brnabić, is actively participating in the session. The consultative summit, spanning June 12 and 13, 2026, brings together international constitutional law experts, delegates from the Council of Europe, and global legal observers.
1. The Roadmap of the Judicial Reform Package
The legislative journey of these judicial laws reflects an intense cycle of external expert evaluations and rapid domestic adjustments aimed at meeting European standards.
Timeline of the Serbian Judicial Reform Cycle
[ Jan 28 ] ──► National Assembly passes the initial judicial law packet.
│
▼
[ Feb ] ──► Speaker Ana Brnabić formally requests a Venice Commission expert review.
│
▼
[ Apr 24 ] ──► Venice Commission delivers its primary evaluation report to Belgrade.
│
▼
[ May 18 ] ──► Ministry of Justice submits revised texts to the Assembly for rapporteurs.
│
▼
[ June 12 ] ──► Plenary session opens in Venice to adopt the final official opinion.
The objective of the revisions is to align Serbia’s domestic court mechanisms and prosecutor operations with modern democratic models. Vladan Petrov, the President of the Constitutional Court of Serbia, expressed firm optimism ahead of the debates, stating that he expects the Venice Commission to deliver a highly favorable final assessment of the upgraded text.
2. Regional Scope of the 147th Plenary Session
The Venice Commission’s current docket extends far beyond Belgrade, addressing fundamental institutional integrity issues across several Eastern European and Mediterranean states.
| Sovereign State | Nature of Case Review | Primary Legal Scope of Assessment |
| Serbia | Final & Urgent Opinions | Comprehensive structural evaluation of the January judicial laws and later modifications. |
| Albania | Standard Plenary Opinion | Targeted constitutional and institutional adjustments. |
| Moldova | Standard Plenary Opinion | Anti-corruption benchmarks and judicial screening tracking. |
| Montenegro | Standard Plenary Opinion | Rule of law statutes and legal synchronization tracks. |
| Poland | Standard Plenary Opinion | Reconstitution of judicial independence safeguards. |
| Iceland | Urgent Opinion Confirmation | Special executive/administrative emergency provisions. |
| Lithuania | Urgent Opinion Confirmation | National security laws and regulatory framework audits. |
3. Behind the Revisions: The High-Profile Serbian Presence
The composition of the Serbian delegation underscores the high political stakes attached to this review, as the final verdict will heavily influence the country’s broader European integration track.
The Serbian Representation Matrix
[ BELGRADE'S REFORM DEFENSE TEAM ]
│
┌─────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
[ Ana Brnabić ] [ Nenad Vujić ] [ Vladan Petrov ]
National Assembly Minister of Justice Constitutional Court
Speaker • Managing technical President
• Leading the political compliance and legal • Overseeing constitutional
defense of the bills. draft alignment. safeguards of the text.
The Ministry of Justice’s May 18 revisions were specifically designed to address previous technical objections raised by European legal experts. With Minister Nenad Vujić managing the immediate legal adjustments, the state leadership hopes that securing a rubber stamp from the Venice Commission this weekend will permanently validate Serbia’s ongoing judicial transition.
