The civic movement Kreni-Promeni (Go-Change) has launched a stinging critique against Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, asserting that his denial of using an acoustic weapon against civilian demonstrators reveals an “indescribable fear” of impending judicial accountability as his presidential mandate nears its conclusion.
The political clash follows intense public scrutiny over the events of March 15, where state security forces allegedly deployed a long-range acoustic device (LRAD)—commonly known as a sonic cannon—to disperse mass anti-government demonstrations in Belgrade.
1. The Evidence Dossier: 2,000 Testimonies and Medical Proof
According to Kreni-Promeni, the presidency’s absolute denial of the weapon’s deployment flies in the face of a massive, meticulously documented evidentiary dossier compiled by civil society and human rights watchdogs.
The Acoustic Weapon Evidentiary Ledger
[ INTERNATIONAL AUDIT ] ──► UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION
• The United Nations formally issued an official inquiry following an
expert technical report and a historic petition signed by 600,000 citizens.
[ CIVILIAN CASUALTIES ] ──► 2,000 SWORN TESTIMONIES
• Legal teams have successfully processed nearly 2,000 direct eye-witness
and victim statements detailing the immediate aftermath of the sonic deployment.
[ FORENSIC CORROBORATION ] ──► CLINICAL DIAGNOSES
• A substantial volume of official medical documentation and physician findings
have been cataloged, proving inner-ear trauma, vertigo, and acoustic shock.
“Vučić’s denial of the sonic cannon demonstrates an indescribable fear now that the end of his presidential mandate, the end of his immunity, and the end of his rule are drawing near.”
— Official Statement, Kreni-Promeni Movement
2. Escalation to the United Nations
The controversy has long bypassed local judicial channels, which Kreni-Promeni accuses of being politically compromised. The movement successfully pushed the issue onto the international stage, triggering high-level institutional oversight.
The Strategic Escalation Pipeline
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ [ STEP 1: POPULAR MOBILIZATION ] ─────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ • Over 600,000 citizens sign a binding petition demanding an │ │
│ immediate independent forensic investigation into the March 15 panic.│
│ │ │
│ [ STEP 2: EXPERT REPORT SUBMISSION ] ─────────────────────────────┤ │
│ • International acoustic specialists and human rights lawyers submit │ │
│ a technical impact brief mapping the decibel levels used in Belgrade.│
│ │ │
│ [ STEP 3: UN FORMAL REPRIMAND ] ──────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ • The United Nations breaks its silence, demanding transparency from │
│ the Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs regarding non-lethal weapons.│
│ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
3. The Legal Outlook: Accusations of State Terrorism
As domestic tensions simmer, Kreni-Promeni is actively framing the future political transition not merely as an electoral shift, but as a path toward comprehensive judicial reckonings for top state officials.
| Political Asset / Factor | Current Status | Projected Legal Outcome |
| Presidential Immunity | Active Safeguard. Vučić is currently shielded from criminal prosecution by executive immunity laws. | Expiration Threat. Kreni-Promeni projects a full loss of immunity at the end of his term, opening the door for domestic indictments. |
| The Sonic Cannon File | Classified / Denied. The government insists no specialized acoustic weaponry was turned on citizens on March 15. | “Act of Terrorism” Trial. The opposition intends to prosecute the deployment under strict “acts of terror against civilians” statutes. |
“Nearly 2,000 citizen testimonies, alongside medical documentation and doctors’ findings, represent evidence that can neither be ignored nor covered up.”
— Kreni-Promeni Legal Dossier
By highlighting the medical trail left behind in Belgrade’s hospitals, Kreni-Promeni aims to ensure that even if local state prosecutors remain frozen today, the evidence will remain fully intact for a transparent, post-regime tribunal.
