The United Nations International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT) in The Hague issued a sharp public reprimand on Thursday, revealing that the Serbian Ministry of Justice has spent months systematically ignoring official inquiries into the legal status of the transferred case against ultranationalist leader Vojislav Šešelj and four of his close political associates.
The contempt-of-court case—originally managed by international prosecutors—was officially handed over to the Serbian judiciary in February 2024 under the premise that Belgrade’s local courts were fully willing and legally equipped to prosecute the matter.
However, a newly unsealed report from the UN-appointed court monitor, Dagmara Albrecht, reveals a complete breakdown in institutional communication, with Belgrade effectively freezing out international oversight.
[THE HAGUE OVERSIGHT DEADLOCK]
• Case Profile: Contempt of court / Illegal leak of protected witness data.
• Main Defendant: Vojislav Šešelj (Leader of the Serbian Radical Party).
• Handover Point: Transferred to Serbia's War Crimes Prosecutor in Feb 2024.
• Current Crisis: Belgrade Ministry of Justice ignoring UN inquiries since November 2025.
• Status Vector: UN Monitor Dagmara Albrecht launched an emergency push on May 18, 2026.
Total Radio Silence from Belgrade’s Justice Ministry
According to Albrecht’s tenth monitoring report submitted to the President of the Mechanism, a senior assistant minister within the Serbian Ministry of Justice explicitly committed back in November 2025 to deliver a comprehensive status update on the local proceedings. Since that meeting, the UN has received “absolutely no responses.”
Albrecht detailed her repeated attempts to break through the bureaucratic stonewalling ahead of a planned international tracking mission to Belgrade:
[THE MONITORING COMPLIANCE TIMELINE]
│
Nov 2025: Serbian Assistant Minister pledges to provide status update.
│
▼
Apr 29, 2026: Albrecht flags unreturned emails, demands a formal response.
│
▼
May 18, 2026: UN Monitor issues an emergency ultimatum; requests meetings.
│
▼
Present Status: Belgrade retains total radio silence; no meeting dates set.
“On May 18, 2026, I once again urgently pressed my requests for information,” Albrecht stated in her official report. “I also notified the Ministry of Justice and the War Crimes Prosecutors’ Office in Serbia of my intention to conduct a field monitoring mission in Serbia, requesting mandatory meetings with their representatives to discuss the status of the transferred case.”
The monitor also contacted the Serbian War Crimes Prosecutor’s Office to independently verify whether the trial is being intentionally bottlenecked because prosecutors are still waiting for a mandatory “preliminary opinion” from the Ministry of Justice.
The Core Charges: 56 Books Exposing Protected Witnesses
The August 2023 international indictment targets the leader of the Serbian Radical Party (SRS), Vojislav Šešelj, alongside his party loyalists: Ljiljana Mihajlović, Ognjen Mihajlović, Miroljub Ignjatović, and Miljan Damnjanović.
They are charged with severe contempt of court for systematically violating the Tribunal’s strict witness-protection rules.
[ŠEŠELJ'S CONTEMPT CASE BACKGROUND]
• Root Conviction: 10-year war crimes sentence (2018) for atrocities in Hrtkovci.
• Contempt Source: Unlawful publication of confidential court archives.
• Scale of Leak: Identities and statements of protected witnesses printed across 56 books.
• Defense Stance: Šešelj openly brags about the leaks, claiming local immunity.
The leak involves sensitive files from Šešelj’s original war crimes trial, which concluded in 2018 with a 10-year prison sentence for his role in driving out ethnic Croat populations from the Vojvodina village of Hrtkovci in 1992.
Šešelj has publicly bragged about using 56 of his published books to print unredacted, classified court transcripts and the true identities of protected witnesses who testified against him.
A Farce for the Media?
When Chinese UN Judge Liu Daqun authorized the transfer of the trial to Belgrade in February 2024, the Mechanism explicitly noted that the move was approved because the crimes occurred on Serbian soil, the defendants were based in Belgrade, and the Serbian government formally guaranteed it would secure the safety of witnesses and vigorously enforce its domestic laws regarding the disclosure of protected information.
However, legal experts inside Serbia warn that Belgrade’s ongoing silence points to an intentional strategy of political stagnation. Independent defense attorneys argue that without relentless international monitoring, the trial will turn into a calculated legal farce, deliberately slowed down until the statutes of limitations expire, or culminating in engineered acquittals due to a lack of local political will.
